DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Espace vs 2017 FAW Besturn X80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFAW
EspaceModelBesturn X80
2017Model year2017
Minivan, CrossoverBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
211 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1618 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
200 HPPower186 HP
260 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 EDCGears6
235/60 R18Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4857 mmLength4620 mm
1888 mmWidth1820 mm
1677 mmHeight1695 mm
1609 KgWeight1610 Kg
2884 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Espace and 2017 FAW Besturn X80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…