DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 FAW Besturn B90 vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeCitroen
Besturn B90ModelC4
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
215 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
186 HPPower150 HP
235 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4340 mm
1812 mmWidth1799 mm
1472 mmHeight1625-1635 mm
1560 KgWeight1430 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 FAW Besturn B90 and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…