DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 FAW Besturn B90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFAW
C30ModelBesturn B90
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
177 HPPower186 HP
400 NmTorque235 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4860 mm
1782 mmWidth1812 mm
1447 mmHeight1472 mm
1451 KgWeight1560 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 FAW Besturn B90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…