DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 FAW A6 vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeVolkswagen
A6ModelSharan
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
198 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
168 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4886 mmLength4620 mm
1810 mmWidth1810 mm
1475 mmHeight1730 mm
1440 KgWeight1665 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 FAW A6 and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…