DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Sm-x vs 2000 FAW A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationFAW A6
HondaMakeFAW
Sm-xModelA6
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationFAW A6
7,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
186 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationFAW A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption—
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationFAW A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationFAW A6
3950 mmLength4886 mm
1695 mmWidth1810 mm
1750 mmHeight1475 mm
1330 KgWeight1440 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Sm-x and 2000 FAW A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…