DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 FAW A6 vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW A6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
FAWMakeHonda
A6ModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

FAW A6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
12,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
168 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW A6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,93 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,43 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW A6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

FAW A6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4886 mmLength3950 mm
1810 mmWidth1695 mm
1475 mmHeight1750 mm
1440 KgWeight1330 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 FAW A6 and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…