DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Elemental Rp1 vs 2017 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ElementalMakeVolvo
Rp1ModelXC60
2017Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,2 s
249 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
280 HPPower235 HP
0 NmTorque480 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
215/45 R17; 245/40 R18Tyre size235/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3740 mmLength4688 mm
1775 mmWidth1902 mm
1070 mmHeight1658 mm
595 KgWeight1976 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2865 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Elemental Rp1 and 2017 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…