DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC60 vs 2017 Elemental Rp1 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeElemental
XC60ModelRp1
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed249 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
235 HPPower280 HP
480 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
235/60 R18Tyre size215/45 R17; 245/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

4688 mmLength3740 mm
1902 mmWidth1775 mm
1658 mmHeight1070 mm
1976 KgWeight595 Kg
2865 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC60 and 2017 Elemental Rp1 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…