DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Elemental Rp1 vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Elemental Rp1

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.5–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ElementalMakeVolvo
Rp1ModelS90
2017Model year2016
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,8 s
249 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
280 HPPower320 HP
0 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/45 R17; 245/40 R18Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3740 mmLength4963 mm
1775 mmWidth1879 mm
1070 mmHeight1443 mm
595 KgWeight—
2525 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Elemental Rp1 and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Elemental Rp1 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…