DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Dodge RAM vs 1999 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge RAM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeLand Rover
RAMModelRange Rover
2002Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
238 HPPower218 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption23,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
265/70 R17; 245/70 R17Tyre size255/65R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5834 mmLength4713 mm
2019 mmWidth1853 mm
1880 mmHeight1817 mm
—Weight2120 Kg
3569 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Dodge RAM and 1999 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge RAM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…