DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Dodge Durango vs 2006 Dodge Charger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeDodge
DurangoModelCharger
2004Model year2006
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
350 HPPower355 HP
502 NmTorque525 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank76 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/65 R16Tyre size235/55 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4915 mmLength5082 mm
1811 mmWidth1891 mm
1791 mmHeight1479 mm
2220 KgWeight1860 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Dodge Durango and 2006 Dodge Charger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…