DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Dodge Charger vs 2004 Dodge Durango Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeDodge
ChargerModelDurango
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
355 HPPower350 HP
525 NmTorque502 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/55 ZR18Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5082 mmLength4915 mm
1891 mmWidth1811 mm
1479 mmHeight1791 mm
1860 KgWeight2220 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Dodge Charger and 2004 Dodge Durango approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…