DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 De Tomaso Mangusta vs 2000 TVR Chimaera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Chimaera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

De TomasoMakeTVR
MangustaModelChimaera
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h4,4 s
240 km/hTop speed253 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4275 cc
305 HPPower280 HP
406 NmTorque398 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank57 lt
20 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/40 R17Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength3965 mm
1900 mmWidth1730 mm
1280 mmHeight1223 mm
1400 KgWeight1060 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2282 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 De Tomaso Mangusta and 2000 TVR Chimaera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Chimaera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…