DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 De Tomaso Mangusta vs 2000 De Tomaso Mangusta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

De Tomaso Mangusta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

De TomasoMakeDe Tomaso
MangustaModelMangusta
1999Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
305 HPPower305 HP
406 NmTorque406 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
20 ltUrban consumption20 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/40 R17Tyre size255/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4190 mmLength4190 mm
1900 mmWidth1900 mm
1280 mmHeight1280 mm
1400 KgWeight1400 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 De Tomaso Mangusta and 2000 De Tomaso Mangusta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, De Tomaso Mangusta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…