DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Daewoo Winstorm vs 2011 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeGreat Wall
WinstormModelCowry
2011Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
7Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
186 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
152 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4574 mm
1850 mmWidth1704 mm
1720 mmHeight1845 mm
1690 KgWeight1510 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Daewoo Winstorm and 2011 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…