DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Great Wall Cowry vs 2011 Daewoo Winstorm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeDaewoo
CowryModelWinstorm
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
143 HPPower152 HP
185 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size215/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4635 mm
1704 mmWidth1850 mm
1845 mmHeight1720 mm
1510 KgWeight1690 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Great Wall Cowry and 2011 Daewoo Winstorm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…