2000 • Daewoo
Tico
Daewoo Tico 0.8 (48 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
2000 Daewoo Tico vs 2004 Caterham CSR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Caterham
CSR
Caterham CSR 2004Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Caterham CSR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 35 points.
39.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo TicoSpecificationCaterham CSR
DaewooMakeCaterham
TicoModelCSR
2000Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Daewoo TicoSpecificationCaterham CSR
17,0 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
143 km/hTop speed225 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
48 HPPower200 HP
64 NmTorque221 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo TicoSpecificationCaterham CSR
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo TicoSpecificationCaterham CSR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
135 R12Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
Dimensions
Daewoo TicoSpecificationCaterham CSR
3340 mmLength3300 mm
1400 mmWidth1685 mm
1395 mmHeight1140 mm
640 KgWeight565 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2315 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Tico and 2004 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 35 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…