DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Smart Fortwo vs 2000 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Tico

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeDaewoo
FortwoModelTico
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed143 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement796 cc
41 HPPower48 HP
100 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank30 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size135 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3340 mm
1515 mmWidth1400 mm
1549 mmHeight1395 mm
805 KgWeight640 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Smart Fortwo and 2000 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…