2000 • Daewoo
Tico
Daewoo Tico 0.8 (48 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
2000 Daewoo Tico vs 1995 Perodua Nippa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Perodua
Nippa
Perodua Nippa 0.9 (58 Hp) 1995Overall Score38.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Tico
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo TicoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
DaewooMakePerodua
TicoModelNippa
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo TicoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
17,0 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
143 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement847 cc
48 HPPower58 HP
64 NmTorque63 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo TicoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank32 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo TicoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
135 R12Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo TicoSpecificationPerodua Nippa
3340 mmLength3395 mm
1400 mmWidth1395 mm
1395 mmHeight1410 mm
640 KgWeight650 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Tico and 1995 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…