DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Daewoo Tico vs 2000 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSmart
TicoModelFortwo
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
143 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement698 cc
48 HPPower61 HP
64 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank33 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
135 R12Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3340 mmLength2500 mm
1400 mmWidth1515 mm
1395 mmHeight1549 mm
640 KgWeight805 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Daewoo Tico and 2000 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…