DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Matiz vs 1999 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeDaewoo
MatizModelTico
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
144 km/hTop speed143 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement796 cc
52 HPPower48 HP
69 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank30 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R13Tyre size135 R12

Dimensions

3495 mmLength3340 mm
1495 mmWidth1400 mm
1480 mmHeight1395 mm
725 KgWeight640 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Matiz and 1999 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…