DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2005 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeDaewoo
RezzoModelRezzo
2004Model year2005
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
188 km/hTop speed111 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
121 HPPower121 HP
176 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15 HTyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4350 mm
1755 mmWidth1750 mm
1580 mmHeight1580 mm
1381 KgWeight1392 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Rezzo and 2005 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…