DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

50.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeCitroen
RezzoModelXsara
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
111 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
121 HPPower101 HP
176 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4167 mm
1750 mmWidth1698 mm
1580 mmHeight1405 mm
1392 KgWeight1070 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Rezzo and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…