2000 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
DaewooMakeFord
RezzoModelMondeo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
12,0 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
146 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
4350 mmLength4556 mm
1755 mmWidth1751 mm
1580 mmHeight1427 mm
1230 KgWeight1371 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Rezzo and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…