DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Acura Integra vs 2001 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeLand Rover
IntegraModelFreelander
2001Model year2001
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
141 HPPower120 HP
172 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4382 mm
1710 mmWidth1805 mm
1338 mmHeight1760 mm
1147 KgWeight1380 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Acura Integra and 2001 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…