DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Freelander vs 2001 Acura Integra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAcura
FreelanderModelIntegra
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
120 HPPower141 HP
165 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4380 mm
1805 mmWidth1710 mm
1760 mmHeight1338 mm
1380 KgWeight1147 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Freelander and 2001 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…