DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Daewoo Musso vs 2002 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Terrano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeNissan
MussoModelTerrano
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
160 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
129 HPPower118 HP
260 NmTorque191 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4665 mm
1864 mmWidth1755 mm
1735 mmHeight1850 mm
1850 KgWeight1760 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Daewoo Musso and 2002 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Terrano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…