DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 GAZ 31 vs 2002 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
GAZMakeDaewoo
31ModelMusso
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
12,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
136 HPPower129 HP
198 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationDaewoo Musso
4897 mmLength4640 mm
1840 mmWidth1864 mm
1472 mmHeight1735 mm
1550 KgWeight1850 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 GAZ 31 and 2002 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…