1999 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.9 D (98 Hp) 1999Overall Score39.5/100
1999 Daewoo Musso vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.5 TD (76 Hp) 2000Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Opel Campo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
DaewooMakeOpel
MussoModelCampo
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
21,0 s0–100 km/h23,4 s
143 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
98 HPPower76 HP
191 NmTorque160 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
4640 mmLength4980 mm
1864 mmWidth1690 mm
1735 mmHeight1710 mm
1815 KgWeight—
2630 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Daewoo Musso and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDaewoo Musso vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Korando vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Musso vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 1999 model yearsImage unavailableVSGAZ 31 vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 1999 model yearsVSOpel Campo vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 1999 model yearsComments are loading…