DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Campo vs 1999 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeDaewoo
CampoModelMusso
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

23,4 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
140 km/hTop speed143 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
76 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4980 mmLength4640 mm
1690 mmWidth1864 mm
1710 mmHeight1735 mm
—Weight1815 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Campo and 1999 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…