1996 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Daewoo Musso vs 1996 Holden Frontera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Holden
Frontera
Holden Frontera 2.2 i 16V 4X4 (136 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationHolden Frontera
DaewooMakeHolden
MussoModelFrontera
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationHolden Frontera
15,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
168 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
129 HPPower136 HP
179 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationHolden Frontera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo MussoSpecificationHolden Frontera
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationHolden Frontera
4640 mmLength4192 mm
1864 mmWidth1780 mm
1735 mmHeight1721 mm
1890 KgWeight1828 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Daewoo Musso and 1996 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…