1996 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.0 i 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Daewoo Musso vs 1996 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationChrysler Neon
DaewooMakeChrysler
MussoModelNeon
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationChrysler Neon
15,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
129 HPPower147 HP
179 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationChrysler Neon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo MussoSpecificationChrysler Neon
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationChrysler Neon
4640 mmLength4364 mm
1864 mmWidth1714 mm
1735 mmHeight1369 mm
1890 KgWeight—
2630 mmWheelbase2642 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Daewoo Musso and 1996 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…