DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Smart Fortwo vs 2000 Daewoo Matiz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Matiz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakeDaewoo
FortwoModelMatiz
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

19,8 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed144 km/h
799 ccEngine displacement796 cc
41 HPPower52 HP
100 NmTorque69 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
33 ltFuel tank38 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
145/65 R15; 175/55 R15Tyre size145/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

2500 mmLength3495 mm
1515 mmWidth1495 mm
1549 mmHeight1480 mm
805 KgWeight725 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Smart Fortwo and 2000 Daewoo Matiz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…