2000 • Daewoo
Matiz
Daewoo Matiz 0.8 i (52 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
2000 Daewoo Matiz vs 2001 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.5 D (57 Hp) 2001Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.
39.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MatizSpecificationCitroen Saxo
DaewooMakeCitroen
MatizModelSaxo
2000Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Daewoo MatizSpecificationCitroen Saxo
17,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
144 km/hTop speed158 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
52 HPPower57 HP
69 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MatizSpecificationCitroen Saxo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
38 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo MatizSpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo MatizSpecificationCitroen Saxo
3495 mmLength3718 mm
1495 mmWidth1595 mm
1480 mmHeight1368 mm
725 KgWeight890 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Matiz and 2001 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…