DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeJaguar
GiuliaModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
230 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
180 HPPower163 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4746 mm
1860 mmWidth2070 mm
1436 mmHeight1667 mm
1374 KgWeight1690 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo Giulia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…