DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs 2016 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeJeep
GiuliaModelCherokee
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
230 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
180 HPPower170 HP
380 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
—Transmission9ATX
225/50 R17Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4624 mm
1860 mmWidth1859 mm
1436 mmHeight1634 mm
1374 KgWeight1953 kg
—Luggage capacity423 lt
2820 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Jeep CherokeeDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip Computerstart-stopPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia and 2016 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo Giulia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…