DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs 2017 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMini
GiuliaModelConvertible
2016Model year2017
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
146 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower192 HP
330 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank44 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size195/55 R16 87W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength3850 mm
1860 mmWidth1727 mm
1436 mmHeight1415 mm
1429 KgWeight1200 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2495 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia and 2017 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…