DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Acura Integra vs 1996 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura IntegraSpecificationBMW Z3
AcuraMakeBMW
IntegraModelZ3
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Acura IntegraSpecificationBMW Z3
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
141 HPPower115 HP
172 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura IntegraSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Acura IntegraSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Acura IntegraSpecificationBMW Z3
4380 mmLength4025 mm
1710 mmWidth1692 mm
1338 mmHeight1288 mm
1147 KgWeight1160 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Acura Integra and 1996 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…