DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 BMW Z3 vs 1996 Acura Integra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura Integra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationAcura Integra
BMWMakeAcura
Z3ModelIntegra
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationAcura Integra
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower141 HP
168 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationAcura Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationAcura Integra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationAcura Integra
4025 mmLength4380 mm
1692 mmWidth1710 mm
1288 mmHeight1338 mm
1160 KgWeight1147 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 BMW Z3 and 1996 Acura Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…