DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Dacia 1325 vs 1994 Geo Prizm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Prizm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Prizm
DaciaMakeGeo
1325ModelPrizm
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Prizm
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1578 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
75 HPPower106 HP
120 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Prizm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Prizm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/80 R13 HTyre size175/65 R14

Dimensions

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Prizm
4151 mmLength4395 mm
1636 mmWidth1685 mm
1430 mmHeight1355 mm
935 KgWeight1070 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Dacia 1325 and 1994 Geo Prizm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Prizm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…