DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Geo Prizm vs 1994 Dacia 1325 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Prizm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo PrizmSpecificationDacia 1325
GeoMakeDacia
PrizmModel1325
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Geo PrizmSpecificationDacia 1325
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1578 cc
106 HPPower75 HP
142 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo PrizmSpecificationDacia 1325
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo PrizmSpecificationDacia 1325
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/80 R13 H

Dimensions

Geo PrizmSpecificationDacia 1325
4395 mmLength4151 mm
1685 mmWidth1636 mm
1355 mmHeight1430 mm
1070 KgWeight935 Kg
2465 mmWheelbase2441 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Geo Prizm and 1994 Dacia 1325 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Prizm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…