2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i 16V (110 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 1.8 16V (117 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
CitroenMakeMG
XsaraModelZS
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
10,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
110 HPPower117 HP
155 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
4167 mmLength4520 mm
1698 mmWidth1700 mm
1405 mmHeight1390 mm
1115 KgWeight1125 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…