DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
MGMakeCitroen
ZSModelXsara
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
19 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
117 HPPower110 HP
160 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationCitroen Xsara
4520 mmLength4167 mm
1700 mmWidth1698 mm
1390 mmHeight1405 mm
1125 KgWeight1115 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…