DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus RX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationLexus RX
CitroenMakeLexus
XMModelRX
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationLexus RX
8,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
233 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
190 HPPower201 HP
267 NmTorque283 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationLexus RX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,9 ltUrban consumption17,7 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationLexus RX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationLexus RX
4708 mmLength4580 mm
1794 mmWidth1815 mm
1394 mmHeight1660 mm
1550 KgWeight1800 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus RX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…