DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Escape vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
EscapeModelXM
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
175 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2976 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
203 HPPower190 HP
271 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4394 mmLength4708 mm
1780 mmWidth1794 mm
1702 mmHeight1394 mm
1600 KgWeight1550 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Escape and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…