DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XMModelEscape
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
233 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2976 cc
190 HPPower203 HP
267 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,9 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4394 mm
1794 mmWidth1780 mm
1394 mmHeight1702 mm
1550 KgWeight1600 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…