DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Citroen XM vs 1995 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLand Rover
XMModelDefender
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
5Doors2

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed115 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
129 HPPower83 HP
285 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption14,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength3722 mm
1794 mmWidth1790 mm
1394 mmHeight2000 mm
1564 KgWeight1636 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Citroen XM and 1995 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…