1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.3 E (133 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.5 TD (129 Hp) 1995Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Citroen XM
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
AudiMakeCitroen
80ModelXM
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
10,1 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
195 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
133 HPPower129 HP
186 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationCitroen XM
4482 mmLength4708 mm
1695 mmWidth1794 mm
1408 mmHeight1394 mm
1310 KgWeight1564 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…