DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Citroen XM vs 1993 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMitsubishi
XMModelPajero
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

17,6 s0–100 km/h21,5 s
173 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2138 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
82 HPPower99 HP
147 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4655 mm
1795 mmWidth1695 mm
1385 mmHeight1855 mm
1305 KgWeight1875 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Citroen XM and 1993 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…