DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Toyota 4runner vs 1993 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeCitroen
4runnerModelXM
1993Model year1993
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

22,0 s0–100 km/h17,6 s
145 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2138 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
215 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4710 mm
1690 mmWidth1795 mm
1745 mmHeight1385 mm
1750 KgWeight1305 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Toyota 4runner and 1993 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…